1. According to the article, what are some reasons that students
find Shakespeare difficult to understand? What does Mack present as an answer
to this?
Typically, for students, Shakespeare is hard to understand because
when first read, it does no come across pleasantly. This is due to the language
used throughout his works as well as the manner in which he presents the
stories. Mack compares Shakespeare to music and songs. He states that
Shakespeare is much like a song that seems completely random when first
listened to; however, after you listen to it time and time again [or in
Shakespeare’s case, read] it begins to make sense and every time that you
listen to it again you pull something completely new from the song [or the
play].
2. According to Mack, when you finally “get” Shakespeare, what do you
actually get?
According to Mack, when you finally “get” Shakespeare you gain a
reflection of the world – and yourself – in their true nature. He says that
once you finally understand the plays, you being to understand that the
Shakespeare’s works are actually multiple interpretations of yourself, which
can be seen throughout the plethora of characters who all represent something
that resonates with you. Basically he says that to read Shakespeare is “to read
the world,” and that Shakespeare’s interplay between life and literature help
you find beauty and meaning in life – things that you will only find after
“getting” Shakespeare.
3. List and summarize five convincing arguments in answer to the
question “Why read Shakespeare?
- · To develop new interests and take a deeper look into understanding things that might look not-so-appealing the first time around, such as certain songs or Shakespeare’s plays.
- · To gain insight into the world, as stated in the answer above. To better understand yourself and the rest of the world and look upon it in different manners than you would originally do by yourself.
- · To learn the source of the majority of my so-called innate beliefs, such as the idea that love and marriage go together. To fully understand the origins of all of my ideas
- · To develop my “skills” and erase my defects AKA developing my soft skills that are required in all walks of life, such as communicating clearly with people, and erasing detrimental automatic (whether or not they are innate or learned) actions, such as not jumping to conclusions.
- · To better understand the heart. To fully understand your own emotional life and the manner in which your head and your heart work together and depend on one another, especially since fully understanding this marks a person as an educated person or an uneducated person.
4. Which one of these arguments do you find most convincing? Why?
To me the most convincing argument of the five listed above is to
gain insight into the world. As a relatively quiet person, I quite enjoy
spending time by myself pondering my surroundings and trying to fully
understand them, as well as reflecting and understanding myself. If Mack says
that Shakespeare would add insight to myself, that makes me take a second look
and think that I maybe should pick up the
Twelfth Night or Hamlet the next
time that I am at the library. Understanding all of the aspects that make up
all humans – but particularly myself – is appealing, especially as I think that
it would help me handle certain situations with other people in different (and
hopefully more effective) manners.
Great job, Grace!
ReplyDelete50/50